On September 9, 1998 the Toronto Regional Coroner released a
report on all 38 cycling fatalities involving motor vehicles
occurring in the City of Toronto from 1986 to 1996. In the evening, the
Coroner was interviewed on CBC Radio. The interview was broadcast
nationally across Canada.
Although the report expresses a number of useful views, it must
be treated with caution. Cause and effect relationships were
not clearly established, so many of the recommendations have no
scientific basis. Also, a comparison of the report with the draft
version indicates political doctoring, presumably to satisfy the
ends of the interest groups on an advisory committee which the Coroner
set up. The Coroner also accepted submissions from the public.
1 in a parking lot
8 occurred in the dark
[This is a high percentage given the low cycling activity which occurs
during the hours of darkness. Why wasn't it explored?]
The report notes that no conclusions can be drawn from the data because of small
sample size
Introduction to Recommendations
Because of the diverse backgrounds of committee participants, opinions
on recommendations were variable. Some recommendations received limited support.
They were included to provoke discussion.
Recommendations
- Improve collision data reporting, collection and analysis
- Collision prevention [is to be achieved] through:
law enforcement against both motorists and cyclists [at the moment, virtually all
traffic law enforcement is aimed at motorists], and
identification of problem sites and improvement in their road design.
- Promotion of helmet use [noting that legislation in other countries has
failed to produce any statistically significant reduction in fatalities
and head injuries]
- Increased cycling content in publications and driver programs required
- Establish a highway traffic law review process
- Development of bicycle routes and bicycle lanes to enhance bicycle
safety
[This recommendation is blatantly political since it was not mentioned
in the draft report, no scientific basis for it is offered, and is at
variance with what the Coroner said on the radio. It appears to be a
sop to the vocal bikeway advocates on the Committee]
- Side guards for trucks
COMMENTS
It should be noted there were discrepancies between the report's recommendations
and the personal views expressed by the Coroner in the radio interview. In the
report, he appears to have partly distanced himself from the recommendations by
attributing them to the advisory committee made up of representatives of various
interests including cyclists, anti-car activists, bicycle dealers, the insurance
industry, government, truckers, police, and health care.
His radio interview focussed somewhat more on equality on roads and the rights
of cyclists as drivers of vehicles. The Coroner said 60% of cyclists deaths
can be attributed to cyclist error.
SYNOPSIS OF RADIO INTERVIEW
- education required of both motorists and cyclists in the rights
of cyclists to share the roadway
- the issue [is] respect of cyclists' right to be in the roadway
rather than hugging the kerb
- the "stay right law" requiring cyclist to ride as far to the
right as practicable needs to be clarified - it's not clear
what "practicable" means
- cyclist may [i.e. has the right to] dominate the lane or be in a
centre lane
- there are some inconsistencies between current cyclist education
and the Highway Traffic Act of Ontario
- cyclist confidence-building [in taking the centre of the lane or
riding wherever on the roadway] through experience is needed
[The above comments clearly show the Coroner endorses vehicular
on-road cycling]
- it's a two sided coin; education of motorists is also required
- problems with bike lanes need to be reviewed; [bike lanes] are
normally on the right side of the roadway and perceived as where
cyclists belong but [in the bike lane] is not always appropriate
and causes confusion, for example left turns, and motorist right
turns; need for clarification if they [bike lanes] are to be a
solution
- bicycle helmets: an asset but not a panacea; [they] discouraged
cycle use in New Zealand and other places where mandated; [in cases of] high
impact speed of motor vehicles [helmets] won't prevent death; helmets will
help in falls
Recommendations:
1. Education
2. Clarification of Highway Traffic Act
3. Federal regulations to require trucks and buses to
have side bars across wheel wells.
FURTHER INFORMATION
A Report on Cycling Fatalities in Toronto 1986 - 1996, Recommendations
for Reducing Cycling Injuries and Deaths, July 1, 1998, W.J. Lucas,
Regional Coroner for Toronto
Copy available from:
The Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario
28 Grenville Street
Toronto, ON
M7A 2G9